This week in class we were given a past successful SSHRC
application to examine for formatting. I found this exercise quite interesting
as I applied to SSRHC last year and was successful in my application. The
format of the application that my group was reviewing was significantly
different than my own, which confirms that the three different structures
presented in class are all valid and possible options. The main complaint that I
had about the application that my group was reviewing (Queer Eye for the
Straight Guy), is that the applicant jumped right into their research interest
and question and left any personal information until the very end. I found it
difficult to connect with the applicant and the research proposal as I had no
idea where this idea had come from – not even their program of study. This is
not vital information to understand the topic at hand, but in an application
where you are trying to demonstrate why you are the best candidate to conduct
this research, it seems that a little bio at the start would provide that hook.
For my own proposal I had sub-headings (Program of Study,
Research Context, Research Objectives, Research Methodology and Importance to
the Advancement of Knowledge). I find
personally that these helped me to think through the various aspects of my
proposal to ensure that I was able to say as much as possible in a limited
space.
I looked over my proposal this week as I am planning on
reviewing and editing it for this course. The part that I found relevant and
also slightly sad was my section on Research Methodology, which was admittedly
quite vague and, as I can already tell from the readings this week, misguided.
Having never taken a research methods course, I admit I “faked” this section
with the rough knowledge that I had… apparently convincingly! I had planned to
use telephone interviews with small community museums across the country to assist
in my research on fundraising in rural museums. After reading Knight this week
I can now see that this method of interviewing might not be my best option. Knight says that phone interviews are best for “fixed-response” surveys which is not ideal for the
questions that I would be asking. Hopefully a different method will reveal
itself in the coming weeks! (Suggestions welcome!)
I have done semi-structured interviews over the phone before with some success. It can help if you can use a video conferencing software, like Skype, so that you can pick up on non-verbal cues. If you're talking to a community that's passionate about what they do, like I imagine those involved in small museums are, their enthusiasm for the research might overcome not being in-person. Best of luck!
ReplyDelete