As with Colin below, this is also my first research methods
course. In my undergraduate degree in Classics, I spent a lot of time
translating Latin, and less time writing research papers. There were some, of
course. The research, however, that I was doing was more an exercise in
compiling information already written (as scholars have been studying the
Classical era for centuries) – I wasn’t really doing what I would call
“original research.”
I did do some archaeology during
my undergrad though, which is a kind of research, although clearly very
different from writing a research paper. I think, though, that archaeology can
relate interestingly to some of the concepts put forth by Luker in the first
few chapters of her book. “You can be surprised by your findings,” she writes
on page 6. This simple statement caught my interest as it seems to relate to
many other topics that she brings up later, such as bias. This is the same in
archaeology. For example, you might think that you are excavating an ancient burial ground,
but in the end it is really a fallen down wall with a random body buried beside
it. And, you may wish that it was a burial ground, because that would be more
prestigious or maybe you are a specialist in ancient burials and you wouldn’t
want to have wasted all of this money on an old wall. But maybe the wall is
from an important fortress not yet discovered. You could make this discovery if
you aren’t afraid to be surprised by your findings. This is the same, in my
view, for research papers and why considering your personal bias when setting
up the project is so important. I think that this is what Luker is getting at
in chapter 3 with regards to survey parameters. I also think that it will
continue to be an important consideration for all research methods, not just
surveys.
I’ve had more experience with
research methods since starting Museum Studies last fall. A few projects
include writing a successful SSHRC proposal about funding for rural museums, a
paper on the American and Canadian bicentennial War of 1812 celebrations, a
paper on forgeries of Minoan Goddess sculptures in museums, and research on the
successes of government grant programs in Ontario for my summer internship. These projects were all extremely different and all employed a variety of research methods without me really
thinking or knowing that I was using them. I’ll be interested to consider
exactly which methods I used in each case once we learn more about each method.
The Minoan forgeries sound fascinating. Were you dealing with forgeries by later (but still ancient) Mediterranean cultures, or were you dealing with modern forgeries?
ReplyDeleteHi! I was dealing with modern (early 20th century) forgeries! There is one on display at the ROM at the moment - she is called "Our Lady of Sports" and is in the Roman gallery in a temporary display case. She is fake! There is also an awesome book called "Mysteries of the Snake Goddess: Art, Desire and the Forging of History" by Kenneth Lapatin. I'd highly recommend it - it reads like a mystery novel.
Delete