This week Luker tells us to read the last five years of a
journal that we would be interested in being published in. I find this idea
extremely daunting. Firstly, I don’t know yet what I want my research interest,
let alone question to be. I’m not even sure what area I want to focus on.
As a Museum Studies student I could be researching anything from collecting
human remains to fundraising for non-profits. These topics are covered by very
different journals. Even if I did have some notion of what area I wanted to
research in, simply deciding which journals to focus on would be a challenge.
Luker fails to note that almost all journals that we access these days are
online in databases. I find that consequently I view articles as stand-alone
pieces, and not as part of a larger publication. When we aren’t faced with the
physical copy of the journal, I think that we are less likely to peruse the
rest of the contents to find the common elements and views. I often find that I
don’t pay much attention at all to which journal it is coming from until it is
time for footnotes and the bibliography.
Perhaps the take away from this
concept for me is a smaller step than reading five years of one journal – maybe
I should start by paying more attention to which journals the articles that I
enjoy are coming from and this might help me to narrow down a subject area as
well as a potential publication. Baby steps.
You're absolutely right. I'm pretty sure I couldn't name a single journal off the top of my head (without just guessing a title). I'm also pretty sure I've never handled a physical journal in my life, though I've been using journal articles for a half dozen years.
ReplyDelete