As with the rest of the posts this week, I found the subject
matter of this week’s readings to be eye opening. The internet is so taken for
granted in my schooling experience that I have never paused to consider its
infrastructure, or using the internet to conduct ethnographic research. I don’t
think that the type of research that I am interested in conducting for my
proposal relates to, or lends itself well to internet research. Many of the
institutions (museums) that I am
interested in interviewing don’t have websites or a web-presence. That being
said, I can see how there are many facets that would need to be considered if I
were to use the internet to gather data.
I enjoyed Star’s comparison of computers to sewers, rather
than information highways. It gave me a tangible and understandable visual for
the type of infrastructure that supports our information networks. Also, Star states,
“infrastructure is generally invisible,” which we must also keep in mind when
conducting ethnographic research studies. Since we cannot see the
infrastructure, we have to at find a way to consider it in order to set the
boundaries of our research. When I stop to consider the scope of the internet
as a whole, it seems entirely overwhelming and impossible to study. I think
that knowing this I would approach potential internet research with caution if
I am faced with it.
I agree with you Claire on how the infrastructure of the internet as a whole is enormous and can be very challenging to study if you don't know where to start and your boundaries. It also brings up a lot of questions on the quality of the data you would find online. In today's age of the internet, it can be a dangerous place if you don't know what your looking for. Unlike in person, you don't know the person and in some cases, it could be a computer robot or some spammer. I do believe there are tons of potentially great online researching to be done but should be done with caveat emptor.
ReplyDelete