After looking at this week’s
readings, I also found it surprising that there were issues with case
studies. I actually do not mind its “story-telling” nature that much because it’s
what makes them interesting to read. But I understand how this can cause
problems since it makes the findings seem “less scientific”. I also found it interesting in the readings
about coming across situations where using different methods in a research
project can result in having data sets that reveal different things about the phenomenon
that you are studying. This relates to what we have learned in class about how different
methods yield different types of data; this is especially important when you
use more than one method in your research. I think that Yin’s discussion on
case studies reminds us that it is important to understand at the beginning
what types of data that you are trying to collect with each method, and what
types of analysis you can make with the data that you will collect. Yin also
looks at presentation and the ways in which we articulate our findings. He
thinks that in order to avoid “story-telling”, we have to resist creating
elaborate narratives for some data elements during the note-taker stage of the
project; since this will affect how you will articulate and analyze the data
later. Even though Yin specifically talks about case studies, I think there are
things that we can learn and apply to our own projects.
No comments:
Post a Comment